The Dangerous Illusion of Bonnie Blue’s “Freedom”

The recent interview featuring two of pop culture’s most controversial figures, Andrew Tate and Bonnie Blue, was as revealing as one might expect. While Tate, a master of provocation, did most of the talking, Blue, a prominent sex worker, seemed to agree with nearly everything he said. Whether this was genuine agreement or a product of intimidation is up for debate, but her own justifications for her career path reveal a deeply flawed and dangerous worldview.

One of Blue’s most audacious claims is that she is reducing the rape rate, citing a supposed 33% drop in rape statistics due to sex work. This is not only a self-serving justification but a fundamental misunderstanding of the crime itself. Let’s be clear: you don’t combat rape by having attractive women offer themselves up to any man with an impulse. Rapists are not primarily motivated by a lack of access to sex; they are driven by a lust for power and control. The thrill for a rapist is in the act of taking what is not freely given. Offering consensual sex does nothing to address the core pathology of a rapist. To believe otherwise is naive and dangerously misleading.

Blue’s assertion that she doesn’t care about changing society, but is merely a “consequence of the disease of society,” is a weak excuse for her choices. It’s a way to abdicate personal responsibility. Despite claiming she doesn’t mind being called a whore, her constant need to justify her work suggests otherwise. The truth is, her entire career is a desperate bid for financial freedom from the 9-to-5 grind, a path she embarked on even before her divorce was finalized.

But what is this “freedom” she has achieved? It is an illusion. Her career is entirely dependent on the desires of men. And she is not even serving the men who might arguably benefit from a confidence boost—the average, overlooked husband. Instead, she caters exclusively to the highest bidders: the rich and the famous. She is not some liberator of male frustration; she is a luxury good for the elite and fellow male sex workers.

This leads to another of her perverse ambitions: her desire to take the virginity of 18-year-old men to “teach them what women want” in a safe environment. An adult’s obsession with taking the virginity of young men is not a normal life goal; it is a perversion. To send a young man to a sex worker for his first sexual experience is a disservice of the highest order. Part of the pleasure and, more importantly, the learning process of sex is the pursuit. A man learns what women want by engaging with them, by courting them, by learning their individual desires through the natural dance of attraction. A lion in the wild is a magnificent hunter because it must pursue its prey. A lion in a zoo, fed on command, loses its instinct and its power. Sex workers create weaker, less educated men by robbing them of the essential experience of the hunt. A young man “educated” by a porn star may wrongly assume all women want the same thing or, worse, find his future dating prospects ruined by women who rightfully judge him for outsourcing his sexual education. Who’s the better man, the guy who figured out how to talk to girls and sleep with some of the most attractive women on campus, or the guy who’s rich daddy bought him a sex worker because his socially awkward son is still a virgin at 18.

Proponents like Andrew Tate might call her monetization of sex “smart,” but what is the end result? What happens when the money gets boring, as it inevitably does? For a man, earning money provides a sense of power and purpose as a provider. For women, value is often derived not from the money they accumulate, but from the investment a man is willing to make in them. A Birkin bag a woman buys for herself will never feel the same as one given to her by a man who cherishes her. This is not a weakness; it is a reflection of a woman’s innate desire to nurture and be valued within a relationship.

When women get rich so they don’t “need” a man, they often end up resenting them. Yet, rich men rarely hate women; wealth often makes them more eager to engage. Bonnie Blue’s path of radical self-interest is a dead end. As former porn stars like Lisa Ann, now a sports podcaster with a family, have shown, there is a life after the industry, a life that often returns to the fundamental human needs for partnership and family. What will Bonnie Blue do when men are bored of her? She has already peaked. What can top having sex with 1,000 men in 24hrs without causing irreparable physical or psychological damage? This woman got banned from OnlyFans for crying out loud.

Society is always in flux. For so long, we heard about male sexual predators. Now, with women increasingly profiting from their sexuality in the same transactional way, a backlash is inevitable. It is not far-fetched to imagine a future where the #MeToo hashtag is used to support men who have been exploited by female predators for financial gain.

Blue may claim she is a product of society, but a wise person builds their life on something more stable than shifting cultural sands. Living by unchanging principles, like those in the Word of God, provides a foundation that societal whims cannot shake. To live by society’s rules is to end up where Blue is, believing that having sex with 1,000 men for “financial freedom” is a worthy goal. But is it truly freedom? Someday, the money will feel empty. The desire for a partner, for children, for a life of shared purpose, will likely surface. But she will still be the woman who had sex with 1,000 men in one day. Society will not let her forget, and that is a prison, not a liberation.